Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amanda Rodgers vs Nicole Coopersmith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rodgers vs Coopersmith analysis and find out who is favored!
Amanda Rodgers vs Nicole Coopersmith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rodgers 1 - 0 Coopersmith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rodgers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Coopersmith has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rodgers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Coopersmith has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rodgers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coopersmith has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rodgers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Coopersmith winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Coopersmith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 27/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rodgers winning 1 times and Coopersmith being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rodgers winning 2 and Coopersmith winning 0. The last match between Rodgers and Coopersmith was at the Charleston, 28-09-2017, Second, Clay with Amanda Rodgers getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rodgers and Coopersmith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rodgers winning 0 times and Coopersmith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rodgers winning 0, and Coopersmith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rodgers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Coopersmith has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rodgers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coopersmith has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rodgers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coopersmith has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
491
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
791
Rank
475
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
49% (124-130)
Career Total W/L
53% (64-56)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Amanda Rodgers vs Nicole Coopersmith For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Rodgers VS Coopersmith
Sportsbook
Offer
Rodgers VS Coopersmith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Amanda Rodgers | Nicole Coopersmith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (26/45) | 68% (38/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (18/26) | 39% (15/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (8/19) | 50% (9/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (32/56) | 42% (19/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rodgers VS Coopersmith H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Amanda Rodgers
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amanda Rodgers | Nicole Coopersmith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amanda Rodgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicole Coopersmith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christina Rosca
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
25 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Katerina Stewart
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Victoria Hu
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Allura Zamarripa
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sanchez
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rodgers Vs Coopersmith Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rodgers are available here and Coopersmith photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
